Muzzy v. Cahillane Motors, Inc.
Estado: Victoria
GLAD was instrumental in winning a decision from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court that personal information about a plaintiff, such as sexual orientation, may not be introduced in court for the purpose of perpetuating negative stereotypes or inflaming the prejudice of the jury.
GLAD presentó una amicus brief in a case involving a sex harassment claim brought by a lesbian plaintiff against her lesbian supervisor. The case went to trial in order to determine whether the supervisor sexually harassed the plaintiff, and the plaintiff lost. The case was appealed in part on the grounds that the instruction to the jury to consider whether the allegedly harassing conduct would be offensive to a “reasonable lesbian” was prejudicial.
GLAD filed a brief articulating a test that would allow trial courts to provide personal information about a plaintiff, such as sexual orientation, but only if it is for the purpose of ensuring that juries consider the experience of harassment of minorities. GLAD argued that such information may not be used for the purpose of perpetuating negative stereotypes or inflaming the prejudice of the jury. Therefore, such information ordinarily should not be admitted over the objection of plaintiffs. The Supreme Judicial Court articulated a test that incorporated the analysis set forth in GLAD’s brief.
contenido relacionado
-
Ampliando el alcance de GLAD Answers
Leer másNuestra línea de información legal GLAD Answers está trabajando para ayudar a la mayor cantidad de personas posible en Nueva Inglaterra.
-
Familias LGBTQ+ en riesgo: Actualización de las leyes de paternidad para proteger a los padres LGBTQ+ y a sus hijos
Leer másGLAD está liderando el esfuerzo para aprobar la Ley de Paternidad de Massachusetts y proteger a las familias LGBTQ+ en todo el país.
-
El Tribunal Superior de Massachusetts afirma que las personas LGBTQ están protegidas de la discriminación del jurado
Leer másEl fallo de la Corte Judicial Suprema tiene implicaciones importantes para abordar la discriminación del jurado por motivos de raza y condición LGBTQ.