Celebrating 20 Years Since Goodridge v. DPH Brought the Freedom to Marry to Massachusetts, and Eventually the Nation
An excerpt of this article appears in the November/December 2023 issue of Boston Spirit.
Twenty years ago, on November 18, 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court broke the historic barrier on LGBTQ+ people marrying in its landmark Goodridge v. Department of Public Health decision – making Massachusetts the first state to rule that the freedom to marry, or not, must be equally applicable to LGBTQ+ people. This ruling required opening the door to legal marriages in six months’ time.
In the words ofChief Justice Margaret H. Marshall’s majority opinion, “The Massachusetts Constitution affirms the dignity and equality of all Individuals. It forbids the creation of second-class citizens.” This celebration of the commitment, intimacy, family, and mutuality in marriage continues to be quoted in wedding celebrations in Massachusetts and worldwide.
GLAD filed Goodridge in April 2001 on behalf of 7 couples seeking something both simple and profound: constitutional respect for their personal commitment by ending the exclusion on joining in legal marriage and marriage’s protections, rights, and responsibilities.
We honor Gloria Bailey-Davies, Linda Bailey-Davies, Edward Balmelli, Maureen Brodoff, Gary Chalmers, Rob Compton, Hillary Goodridge, Julie Goodridge, Michael Horgan, Richard Linnell, Gina Nortonsmith, Heidi Nortonsmith, Ellen Wade, and David Wilson.
Each of them authentically gave of themselves and created connections and bridges of understanding with the wider community even while in a crucible of media and political attention and conflict. They advanced equal rights for all of us in Massachusetts and that beacon of hope spread far and wide. With other marriage plaintiffs, including in challenges in Hawaii and Vermont before Goodridge, and cases across the country after, the Goodridge plaintiffs’ full and complete victory paved the way for more.
The reality of people’s marriages in Massachusetts set the stage for dismantling the federal Defense of Marriage Act – first in GLAD’s 2009 challenge in federal court and 2012 unanimous victory at the First Circuit Court of Appeals, and then carried through by other plaintiffs at the Supreme Court in 2013. Community members and organizations, including GLAD, worked together in legislatures and courts across the U.S. In 2013, GLAD was asked to join the team representing plaintiffs in Michigan, in the case that would lead to the Supreme Court Obergefell ruling for marriage equality nationwide in 2015.
Looking back now, it can be tempting to think this was all inevitable. But that is far from true.
It took relentless hard work, commitment, and courage from the 14 plaintiffs, attorneys, amici and their attorneys, and so many others. The Goodridge plaintiffs withstood a trial court loss – expected but still disappointing – and redoubled their efforts to connect with people about why marriage was important to them.
Victory was sweet. The Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) beautiful and momentous ruling on November 18, 2003, was a triumph. Even so, it wasn’t the end. The reactions were swift – both the eruption of joy and celebration and also the backlash.
At the same time, the legislature, meeting in a constitutional convention, debated whether to constitutionally ban marriage for same-sex couples or to defend the court’s ruling.
“I stand with the SJC” stickers were everywhere, along with throngs of supporters and opponents inside and outside the State House.
Amidst all of this, couples acted on the simple desire to protect their, in some cases, decades-long love and commitment, and planned wedding celebrations.
It is never easy to leave an organization you love.
In my 17 years with GLAD – the last nine as Executive Director – it has been an incredible honor to work alongside a phenomenal team and a devoted community of supporters to advance liberty and equality for LGBTQ+ people.
In my first year as ED, I had the privilege of sitting in the U.S. Supreme Court to watch GLAD attorney Mary Bonauto argue for the freedom to marry nationwide.
Three months later, I listened to Justice Kennedy read his majority decision in Obergefell v. Hodges from the bench.
It began: “The Constitution’s promise of liberty extends to all within its reach.”
With those words, thousands of LGBTQ+ couples were granted access not only to a cherished social institution, but a fundamental Constitutional right and marker of equal citizenship.
Many commentators at the time myopically claimed that our victory was always inevitable – a result of generational change.
But we know better.
We understand that while the promise of liberty is embedded in our Constitution, its reach has never been guaranteed. Millions have fought decade after decade to extend that reach so that all Americans, including LGBTQ+ Americans, could take one step closer to full belonging.
And we have many more steps to take.
Nothing is inevitable, as we know too painfully well from the scores of anti-LGBTQ+ attacks we are fighting today.
As we look back at GLAD’s historic victory 20 years ago in Goodridge v. Dept of Public Health, which made Massachusetts the first state in the country to allow same-sex couples to marry and paved the way for Obergefell, we know that our progress has never been guaranteed.
It has been earned through hard work and perseverance.
We can never stop working to extend the reach of liberty – not until we reach some final endpoint of justice, but rather in service of justice.
While I prepare to begin a new chapter with the Trevor Project, I am thrilled to join you in serving justice as a GLAD supporter.
Our community and our country are facing difficult fights ahead, and I cannot imagine an organization more prepared to lead those fights than GLAD.
With the interim stewardship of veteran LGBTQ+ leader and founding board chair Richard Burns, I know that GLAD is on strong footing to continue its critical work. And I know that the incredible GLAD community of staff, board, and supporters will find the right next leader to shepherd and grow GLAD’s capacity to expand the reach of liberty throughout the country and advance an anti-racist and intergenerational justice movement for decades to come.
I cannot wait to follow all of GLAD’s victories going forward, as a current donor, former ED, and forever member of the GLAD community.
It is through community that we will survive, thrive, and advance the reach of liberty and justice for all.
And what a fabulous and diverse community it is – it has been an honor to serve you all.
Thank you for being with me on this incredible journey.
Richard Burns, Interim Executive Director Carole Allen-Scannell, Director of Development Josh Arsenault, Assistant Director of Development Mary L. Bonauto, Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies Eva Boyce, Chief Financial Officer Gary Buseck, Senior Advisor Patience Crozier, Director of Family Advocacy Braedyn Dorn, Public Affairs and Education Assistant Courtney Dougherty, Constitutional Law Fellow Chris Erchull, Attorney Kendrick Foster, Legal Assistant Beth Grierson, Assistant Director of Operations and Administration Kayden Hall, GLAD Answers Coordinator Gabrielle Hamel, Public Information Manager Michael Johnson, Chief Legal Officer Amanda Johnston, Director of Public Affairs and Education
Ivory King, Assistant Director of Communications and Public Engagement Bennett Klein, Senior Director of Litigation and HIV Law Jennifer L. Levi, Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights Ben Marcus, Constitutional Law Fellow Carol Marton, Business Manager Qwin Mbabazi, Senior Manager of Organizational Culture and Community Partnerships Mads Ouellette, Database Systems and Development Communications Coordinator Renae Paulson, Development Assistant Michelle Peng, Individual Giving and Special Events Coordinator Aria Pierce, Manager of Institutional Giving Jo Troll, Finance and Operations Coordinator Bob Tumposky, IT Manager Aaron Wolfson, Digital Media Manager Jessica Vocaturo, Legal Research and Operations Manager
Board of Directors
Shane Dunn,President Mario Nimock,Vice President Marlene Seltzer,Treasurer Joseph Metmowlee Garland, Clerk Annika Bockius-Suwyn Jean-Phillip Brignol Mark Brimhall-Vargas, PhD Darian M. Butcher Edward Byrne Dallas M. Ducar, MSN, RN, PMHNP-BC, CNL Matthew McGuirk Beth R. Myers Lee Swislow Jacob Smith Yang
Defending Our Common Humanity
Far-right attacks are putting transgender youth and their families directly in harm’s way and putting all of us at risk. We are fighting back.
We all deserve to live and love freely and be supported and celebrated for who we are. The current onslaught of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation is taking aim at those fundamental ideals, with devastating consequences for children, families, and all of us.
Since 2021, 22 states have passed transgender healthcare bans and 23 states have barred transgender kids as young as elementary school from playing school sports. Multiple states have passed some version of a “Don’t Say Gay or Trans” law censoring teachers, schools, and students. Others have made it impossible for transgender and gender diverse students to use the restroom at school.
A handful of states now require schools to out students to parents, a policy far-right groups are pushing for in the courts and local communities as well. Such policies interfere with teachers’ ability to support their students and to help ensure parents have the resources they need to support their LGBTQ+ children.
“We will support these parents and their kids in pushing back against that dangerous reality on every level.
– Jennifer Levi, Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights
States are trying to ban drag shows and keep books about LGBTQ+ families out of school libraries.
The far right is advancing its anti-democratic agenda on the backs of transgender and LGBQ+ youth and adults. Fortunately, those of us who believe in freedom and our common humanity are fighting back.
GLAD is in the thick of the fight, directly challenging laws in Alabama, Florida, and New Hampshire, and supporting our partner organizations in other legal battles across the country.
In Alabama, we are challenging the criminal ban on medical care for transgender adolescents.
Last year, we presented two days of testimony in federal court from medical and scientific experts, transgender adolescents, and their parents. The Court concluded, as every other district court judge across the country to hear the facts since has, that there is no justifiable reason for the state to categorically ban access to safe, established, and necessary medical care simply because someone is transgender.
A panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals recently reversed the district court’s ruling. We are asking the full 11th Circuit to reconsider the panel opinion and preserve the injunction barring the law from being enforced.
In Florida, where another district court also preliminarily blocked a law banning care for transgender adolescents, we are preparing for a full trial this December. We are also challenging restrictions put on transgender adults’ ability to obtain gender transition-related health care.
These laws target transgender people and put parents in the excruciating position of not being able to provide their adolescent children with the care they know they need to thrive.
As Jennifer Levi, Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights and GLAD’s lead attorney in Alabama and Florida put it: “We will support these parents and their kids in pushing back against that dangerous reality on every level.”
In New Hampshire, we are challenging a school censorship law that chills teachers’ ability to talk to students honestly about race, disability, and LGBTQ+ identities.
Throughout New England we have worked overtime the past three sessions to stop the same harmful anti-LGBTQ+ bills we are seeing across the country.
That includes successfully defeating a bill last year that would have reversed New Hampshire’s ban on the debunked and dangerous practice of so-called conversion therapy. An attempt to challenge another state’s conversion therapy ban is pending consideration at the U.S. Supreme Court.
It can sometimes feel like these attacks came out of nowhere. But we know better. Our community has made tremendous progress over the past 20 years and the right is trying hard to reverse that.
Two decades ago, we began to see states passing express protections against discrimination for transgender people. Today, nearly half the states have such laws on the books.
We are fighting for our freedom, for our right to be ourselves, to live and love fully, and to celebrate our shared humanity. It’s a fight we can’t afford to lose.
Legal victories, educational research, and community advocacy have brought schools to a place of deeper understanding about the importance and fairness of supporting transgender students to express themselves and be respected for who they are.
The medical community has developed policies and practices to make safe and effective treatments for gender dysphoria more accessible. More and more families have the tools to understand and support their transgender children.
In 2020, the Supreme Court affirmed that discrimination on the basis of transgender status and sexual orientation is unlawful under federal law. And earlier this year, the Supreme Court declined to review a landmark ruling from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirming that the Americans with Disabilities Act protects transgender people from disability discrimination.
Increased visibility and understanding of our lives and increased legal protections have all made it more possible for transgender and LGBQ+ people to fully participate in civic life – to live and love freely, to be embraced by families and integrated fully into our communities.
Now, a deliberate effort by influential politically motivated actors seeks to replace our shared humanity with fear and disinformation.
Our power lies in collective action—advocating in courts and in legislatures, and engaging at the ballot box, in grassroots activism, and in everyday conversations.
And the good news is – even now – when we fight, we can win.
Over 500 anti-LGBTQ+ bills were introduced across the country this year – and the vast, vast majority of those were defeated. When federal courts have had the chance to hear our full arguments and truly understand the impact of these laws on people’s lives, we’ve won. Far too many hostile bills have passed, to be sure. But we also can’t lose sight of how many we have defeated.
And while it sometimes seems like we are exclusively playing defense, we are also still advancing laws to protect our community.
This year, Michigan became the 23rd state, along with DC and the U.S. Virgin Islands, to provide comprehensive nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ+ people.
15 states have adopted “provider shield laws” that protect access to medical care for transgender people – GLAD worked with state partners to pass such laws in Massachusetts and Vermont, with more to come.
In Maine this year we helped pass a law that creates a pathway for 16- and 17-year-old transgender adolescents to get medical care in the extraordinary circumstances where a parent objects to care even though denying it results in harm.
Those who want to move us backward and put our community in harm’s way have a lot of power and resources, it’s true. We have our work cut out for us, and we know we won’t win every fight. But we are fighting for our freedom, for our right to be ourselves, to live and love fully, and to celebrate our shared humanity.
That’s a fight we can’t afford to lose.
Texas Ruling Could Lead to New HIV Cases
A case currently before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals could lead to tens of thousands of new and preventable HIV cases.
HIV PrEP (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis) is an extraordinary medical breakthrough that reduces the risk of HIV transmission by close to one hundred percent. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), insurers are required to cover PrEP and other critical preventive care services without charging copays or deductibles, referred to as cost sharing. Last spring, however, a federal district judge in Texas issued a ruling in Braidwood v. Becerra blocking that requirement.
GLAD, with law firm Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky, and Popeo, P.C., filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the appeal of the Braidwood ruling at the Fifth Circuit on behalf of HIV Medicine Association (HMA) and the National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors (NASTAD).
HMA and NASTAD represent thousands of healthcare providers, public officials responsible for stopping the epidemic from every state, and policy experts with expertise in the treatment and prevention of HIV and the demographics and dynamics of the epidemic.
In their brief the organizations issue a dire warning: reinstating cost sharing for PrEP will significantly decrease utilization of PrEP, cause tens of thousands of new and preventable HIV cases, with billions of dollars in associated healthcare costs, and reverse the progress our nation has made towards curbing, and ultimately ending, the HIV epidemic.
“As an organization representing thousands of physicians and other health care professionals working on the frontlines of the HIV epidemic in communities across the country, we are deeply concerned about the harmful and far-reaching impacts this decision will have if allowed to stand,” said Michelle Cespedes, MD, MS, Chair, HIVMA.
The brief analyzes the consequences of a recent epidemiological analysis conducted by experts at Harvard and Yale predicting, under the most cautious and conservative estimates, that blocking the ACA’s no cost sharing provision for PrEP will result in an additional 2,057 HIV infections in the first year alone.
Playing out the study’s straightforward assessment of additional first-year HIV diagnoses, an additional predicted 1,892 secondary infections bring that number to 3,949 people with HIV in just the first year, which will cost the healthcare system a staggering $1.66 billion.
Extending that conservative model just five years into the future predicts approximately an additional 20,000 people with HIV and costs to the United States healthcare system of over $8 billion as a result of the reimposition of barriers to accessing PrEP.
The brief also provides the Court of Appeals with important historical and current-day information about the tremendous toll the HIV epidemic has had on millions of lives, as well as the role discrimination and stigma have played in preventing Americans from accessing highly effective prevention and treatment. While the ruling from the Texas court broadly enjoined the cost-sharing mandate for all recommended preventive services, the case began as a challenge specifically to the requirement to cover PrEP without copays or deductibles.
“The Braidwood decision is rooted in stigma and bigotry towards the LGBTQ+ community and people vulnerable to HIV,” said Dr. Stephen Lee, NASTAD Executive Director. “It will cause incalculable harm to our efforts to end the HIV epidemic.”
Urging the Court of Appeals to understand the devastating consequences for HIV prevention if the District Court’s decision stands, the brief also describes the sobering and unacceptable racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in both the epidemic’s impact and access to PrEP. The most recent CDC estimates from 2021 are that only 11% of Black people and 20% of Hispanic/Latino people who could benefit from PrEP were prescribed it, as opposed to 78% of White people.
“Copays and deductibles deter people from accessing healthcare,” said Ben Klein, Senior Director of Litigation and HIV Law at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders. “PrEP is nearly 100% effective at preventing transmission of HIV, but it is already underutilized, particularly among Black and Latino communities. Allowing the lower court’s ruling in Braidwood v. Becerra to stand will exacerbate racial health disparities, needlessly increase HIV diagnoses, and cost American lives.”
As we await a ruling from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, GLAD is advocating for other approaches to protect and expand access to PrEP. State legislatures have the power to not only codify the ACA’s no cost-sharing requirement under state law, but to go further by ensuring all forms of PrEP, including long-acting injectables, are available to all who can benefit from them. Barriers like co-pays, deductibles, and insurance pre-authorization requirements mean delays in access to PrEP that can lead to avoidable HIV infections with serious health consequences and even death.
PrEP offers us a powerful path to finally end the HIV epidemic. We only need the will, and good health policy, to embrace it.
We Can’t Leave Anyone Behind
Meet Interim Executive Director Richard Burns
Lifelong LGBTQ+ Activist and GLAD Interim Executive Director Richard Burns Cites the Need for Vigilance in the Battle for Full LGBTQ+ Equality and Liberation
As GLAD prepares to begin a robust national search for the leader who will steer the organization’s next chapter, the board is pleased to bring on lifelong LGBTQ+ activist Richard Burns as Interim Executive Director. Richard began his tenure on October 10.
“Leadership transitions are important milestones in any organization at any time,” says GLAD Board President Shane Dunn. “When the rights of LGBTQ+ people, and especially transgender people, are so virulently under attack across the country, and threats to our democracy are creating new barriers to our mission of realizing LGBTQ+, racial, HIV, and gender justice, we recognize an even greater responsibility to be thorough and thoughtful in this process.”
“We must have a commitment to vigilance, always. The battle for LGBTQ+ equality and liberation will go on for generations. We have to have heart. We have to have grit. We have to have resilience and hope.”
Richard Burns
“With significant leadership experience, including multiple tenures as an interim Executive Director, and a deep commitment to GLAD’s goals as an anti-racist, intergenerational legal advocacy organization, Richard will be able to support GLAD’s ongoing critical work with minimal disruption, allowing us the time to develop a careful search process and a diverse, talented, and passionate candidate pool for GLAD’s next permanent Executive Director,” Dunn adds.
Richard’s passion for justice and commitment to advancing equality has led him from Boston to New York and across the country as an advocate and organizational leader. He served more than twenty years as Executive Director of the New York City Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Community Center beginning at the height of the AIDS crisis, and later developed and led the LGBT Leadership Initiative previously housed at the Arcus Foundation.
In recent years, he has effectively steered several social and racial justice-focused organizations through transition periods as an interim ED, including the Drug Policy Alliance, the North Star Fund, the Funding Exchange, Funders for LGBTQ Issues, the Stonewall Community Foundation, Lambda Legal, and, most recently the Johnson Family Foundation.
But “Boston formed me,” Richard says, speaking of his roots in the LGBTQ+ legal advocacy movement and, specifically, with GLAD.
In addition to co-founding the Massachusetts LGBTQ+ Bar Association and the Boston Lesbian & Gay Policy Alliance in 1982, he was president of GLAD’s founding board from 1978-1986 and has maintained his commitment to the organization for 45 years.
He talks of GLAD’s radical founding by John Ward at a time when movements for LGBTQ+, racial, and gender justice were converging, and new organizations began to spring up together to advance liberation for all people. On his first day of law school at Northeastern in 1980, Richard met the late Urvashi Vaid – long-time LGBTQ+ activist and a former GLAD Spirit of Justice honoree – who would become a lifelong friend, a GLAD colleague as an early legal intern, and an inspiration in conceptualizing revolutionary, inclusive queer liberation. Richard is chair of the founding Board of the American LGBTQ+ Museum, an in-development project co-founded by Urvashi, among others, to preserve, research, and share LGBTQ+ history and culture.
In the late 1970s, Richard was managing editor of the Boston-based national feminist, progressive LGBTQ+ newsweekly Gay Community News (GCN), which both chronicled and shaped intersectional queer activism at the time. GCN had an active early prison pen pal program, and Richard was a plaintiff in a successful lawsuit when the U.S. Bureau of Prisons declared GCN and another publication, the Task Force’s It’s Time, obscene and tried to block distribution to incarcerated individuals.
Richard also has the rare distinction of involvement with all three of our major LGBTQ+ legal organizations. In addition to his founding role with GLAD, Richard clerked at the National Center for Lesbian Rights while in law school and served on the board of Lambda Legal beginning in 1980.
In preparing to take on the Interim Director role at GLAD at this pivotal moment, Richard is clear that we must take lessons both from the early days of LGBTQ+ and AIDS activism and draw on the wisdom of today’s justice fighters – working with, and learning from, all movements for liberation.
“We all bring all of our identities with us everywhere. In order to build a just society, we’ve got to take into account all of our collective identities. We can’t leave anyone behind,” Richard says.
Recognizing that the far right has all of us in its sights–our movements for reproductive justice, racial equity, LGBTQ+ liberation, and beyond – he adds:
“We must have a commitment to vigilance, always. The battle for LGBTQ+ equality and liberation will go on for generations. We have to have heart. We have to have grit. We have to have resilience and hope.”
Opportunities to Meet GLAD’s Interim Executive Director:
Wednesday,October 25: Defining Gay Community News
Richard Burns will moderate a panel celebrating the 50th anniversary of Gay Community News on Wednesday, October 25, 6 p.m., at the Massachusetts Historical Society. Visit the History Project for details.
Thursday, November 9: Spirit of Justice
Richard will speak at our annual Spirit of Justice Award Dinner. Visit www.GLAD.org/SOJ to join us.
Legal Update
Litigation
Bernier v. Turbocam A business owner’s religious beliefs must never be a legal justification to deprive an employee of necessary healthcare.
GLAD represents Lillian Bernier, who was denied coverage for medically necessary care by her employer’s self-funded health plan, which has a total exclusion of benefits for gender transition medical care. Lillian is a machinist at Turbocam, Inc., and a mother of two. But unlike her colleagues, she has had to pay out-of-pocket for essential medical care. Turbocam, a large, profitable company that manufactures parts for the aerospace, automotive, and HVAC industries, claims that the owner’s religious beliefs exempt them from following federal and state nondiscrimination laws – but there is no justifiable reason for the company to treat Lillian differently than other employees just because she is transgender.
Lillian’s case is currently at the New Hampshire Human Rights Commission and we will soon file in federal court. GLAD will also include Massachusetts-based Harvard Pilgrim and Health Plans, Inc. in the suit because they contract with Turbocam to administer the plan and provide their expertise and services to aid in its discriminatory health benefits plan.
Doe v. Austin GLAD has sued the Department of Defense in federal court in Maine in a challenge to an antiquated federal statute that prohibits the military’s healthcare program from providing coverage for gender transition surgeries to dependents of military personnel. The law firm Orrick, Herrington, and Sutcliffe LLP are co-counsel.
Dependents of active-duty military personnel are entitled to healthcare benefits through the federal government, administered by an entity called TRICARE, which is part of the Department of Defense. Like other service members, our client John Doe receives healthcare coverage for himself and his family through TRICARE.
John and his college-aged daughter Joan are challenging the law that excludes coverage for transgender dependents’ medically necessary care as a violation of constitutional rights to Equal Protection and Due Process, and as a violation of the federal Rehabilitation Act. Military personnel with transgender family members deserve the same family healthcare access as their military colleagues.
Doe v. Horne GLAD, the Human Rights Campaign, and the National Center for Transgender Equality submitted a brief to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding Arizona’s law that bans transgender girls and women from school sports teams.
The brief outlines how the law both warrants—and fails— heightened constitutional scrutiny as a transgender-status-based classification and fails even rational basis review as a policy enacted specifically to disadvantage transgender girls and women.
Fighting anti-transgender birth certificate laws Having up-to-date government issued documents is essential for many important life events as well as personal safety. But some states are categorically banning transgender and nonbinary people from amending their birth certificate to reflect their accurate gender marker. GLAD filed a brief in a legal challenge to such a policy in Oklahoma, and will file briefs in similar lawsuits in Tennessee and Kansas.
Foote v. Ludlow School Committee GLAD represents the Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents (MASS) in a friend-of-the-court brief filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit defending a common-sense school policy that provides a supportive educational environment and strengthens family communication rather than forcing schools to “out” students before they are ready.
In the case, parents challenged actions taken by teachers and staff at a Ludlow school to support the well-being of two students, including using the students’ requested names and pronouns and waiting to share that information with the parents until the students themselves were ready to do so or finished doing so. The District Court dismissed the case, concluding that the plaintiffs did not present adequate specific facts supporting a legal claim that the school’s actions were a violation of their rights as parents. Our brief presents research about the importance of providing a supportive school environment to ensure positive educational outcomes. By highlighting the role of trusted relationships with and support from teachers and school staff in students’ academic achievement and performance, the brief argues that courts should not disrupt the traditional deference accorded to educators about how to teach and support student learning.
Mejia v. Edelblut GLAD is part of a broad coalition of educators, advocacy groups, and law firms challenging New Hampshire’s ‘banned concepts’ law. In August, we filed new briefs in federal court asking for a declaration that the law is unconstitutional. The briefs highlight how the law actively discourages public school teachers from teaching and talking about race, gender, sexual orientation, disability, and gender identity inside and outside the classroom.
Mejia v. Edelblut(cont’d) Previously, in January, after the state asked the federal court to dismiss the lawsuit, the judge ruled that the case would continue, concluding that the law does “not give teachers fair notice of what they can and cannot teach,” and adding, “[g]iven the severe consequences that teachers face if they are found to have taught or advocated a banned concept, plaintiffs have pleaded a plausible claim that the amendments are unconstitutionally vague.”
LGBTQ+, BIPOC, and students with disabilities are being especially harmed by this law, and its chilling effect is doing a severe disservice to all students when their teachers can’t ensure they gain a full, rich understanding of history and the people and world around them.
Pueblo v. Haas In July, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that Carrie Pueblo has a right to make the case that she is an equitable parent to the child born to her and her former partner during the couple’s relationship, and to petition for custody and parenting time. This is an important ruling for the rights of children and LGBTQ+ parents in Michigan and supports the case for updating and clarifying parentage laws in the state – an effort that GLAD is supporting in states across the country. GLAD joined a friend-of-the-court brief in the case with the ACLU of Michigan, Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, LGBTQA Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, Affirmations LGBTQ+ Community Center, and the National Center for Lesbian Rights.
Carrie Pueblo and Rachel Haas—partners in a committed same-sex relationship—chose to have a child together using assisted insemination, with Ms. Haas carrying the child. When their child was born in November 2008, same-sex couples were not permitted to marry in Michigan, and the couple’s relationship ended before the freedom to marry was legalized in the state with Obergefell. After their separation, Ms. Haas denied Ms. Pueblo all contact with the child she had raised since birth. Ms. Pueblo filed suit in family court seeking shared custody and parenting time, but both the trial court and Michigan Court of Appeals held that because she is not the child’s biological mother, she did not have standing. This left Ms. Pueblo as a legal stranger to her own child.
Legislation
Confirmatory Adoption to Protect Children Born Through Assisted Reproduction Rhode Island and Maine continue to be leaders in supporting and protecting LGBTQ+ people and families with the passage of new laws that make it easier for parents who have had a child through assisted reproduction to confirm their parentage through adoption. “An Act Relating to Domestic Relations — Adoption Of Children,” championed by State Senator Dawn Euer and Representative Rebecca Kislak, was signed into law June 19 in Rhode Island. “An Act to Enable Confirmatory Adoption,” was sponsored by Representative Matt Moonen and signed into law June 28 in Maine. The laws remove cumbersome and costly barriers that non-biological parents face when adopting their own children, making it easier for them to secure an adoption decree to reflect their parentage. This gives families greater protection when they travel or move outside their home state —especially to areas that are less LGBTQ-friendly. GLAD is continuing to advocate for laws across the country to protect LGBTQ+ families, and these two new New England laws provide important security for our communities.
Ensuring and Expanding Access to PrEP GLAD continues our efforts to ensure that anyone who needs access to PrEP can receive it. In Massachusetts, we are advocating for legislation to allow pharmacists to dispense an initial supply of PrEP without requiring a doctor’s prescription, as well as for legislation to ensure all forms of PrEP, including long-acting injectables, are available without co-pays or required pre-authorization. “An Act to Address Barriers to HIV Prevention Medication” and “An Act Enabling Pharmacists to prescribe, dispense and, administer PrEP” are both sponsored by Representative Jack Lewis and Senator Julian Cyr.
The Massachusetts Parentage Act Currently in Massachusetts, many children of LGBTQ+ parents lack equal pathways for their relationships with their parents to be legally recognized, leaving them vulnerable. The Massachusetts Parentage Act (MPA) (H 1713/S 947) ensures equality for LGBTQ+ families. It creates clear and accessible paths to establish legal parentage for all children so that the parent-child relationship is secure from the outset.
“An Act to Ensure Legal Parentage Equality” is sponsored by Representatives Hannah Kane and Sarah Peake and State Senators Julian Cyr and Bruce Tarr.
Momentum is growing to pass this bill, which is long overdue. Our coalition of organizations supporting the MPA has grown to 53 organizations, and this summer Governor Healey’s office went on record in support. Join the work to pass the MPA this session at massparentage.org. Sign up for updates, share your story, or get support to write testimony before the hearing to help this crucial bill pass this session.
Visit Cases and Advocacy to see GLAD’s full current litigation and legislation docket.
Protecting LGBTQ+ Students
Creating Safe and Inclusive Schools Together
All students deserve to feel safe and included at school and have an educational environment that welcomes and affirms their full identities.
Research demonstrates that such positive school climates are necessary for all youth to learn and thrive. For many LGBTQ+ students, this journey includes sharing their identity with their friends or a trusted teacher before they’re ready to do so at home. While most youth want to and do come out to their family in their own time, some are losing that choice. Far-right legal groups are challenging these positive school policies, and some states are enacting laws that would force faculty to contact students’ homes before the students are ready, under the guise of “parents’ rights.”
The past few years of intense political scrutiny and legislative attacks have taken a toll on young people’s mental health and led to trans and LGBQ youth experiencing increased harassment. And so-called “parents’ rights” bills have made it less safe for young people who can’t be their authentic selves with their families. Teachers care about their students and know that generally, kids do better when they can talk to their parents. But sadly, that’s not an option for some youth, leading them to feel isolated both at home and school. But we are fighting to protect all youth, whether they cannot come out at home or need support to discuss their identities with their parents when they are ready.
These “forced outing” bills directly contradict schools’ responsibility to create a supportive educational environment. Federal constitutional protections and many state-based laws are in place to safeguard the rights of LGBTQ+ students. Nevertheless, even in states with explicit obligations to protect LGBTQ+ youth, a vocal minority is attempting to deny young people the autonomy to choose when and how to share their identities with their families.
In September, The First Circuit Court of Appeals heard Foote v. Town of Ludlow, which centers on this issue. We submitted a friend-of-the-court brief with the Massachusetts Superintendent’s Association, sharing research that shows positive school climates and trusted relationships with adults are critical to academic success for all students.
“When teachers and other educators acknowledge and respect students, including their requested names and pronouns, that creates the safety that allows brain development and learning to flourish while also meeting the requirement of equal educational opportunity,” said Mary Bonauto, Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies, at the filing.
GLAD is committed to protecting students and ensuring schools can create positive, inclusive learning environments. But parents and allies can make an impact too.
In addition to supporting GLAD in this crucial work, you can advocate for the LGBTQ+ youth in your life by checking out our website’s school resources page. You’ll find information on LGBTQ+ student rights, bullying protections, and guidance for schools in every New England state and across the country. We’ve also included resources from our partners on inclusion for transgender students in school sports and all areas of academic life, how to advocate for positive school climates, resources for educators, and more.
Familiarizing yourself with these resources can help you advocate for youth and encourage schools to meet their responsibility to ensure equal education and safety for all students. Public schools and many private schools are legally obligated to act when students face bullying and other kinds of mistreatment or harassment so that all students can learn and thrive.
If you need further support, GLAD Answers can provide free and confidential legal information and assistance.
Expanding GLAD Answers’ Reach
Expanding GLAD Answers’ Reach Where We’re Needed Most
GLAD Answers, GLAD’s legal information line, is busy. This year so far, we have a monthly average of 169 intakes, up from 130 per month in 2022. GLAD Answers staff can answer questions and support a high number of callers with the help of 20 GLAD Answers volunteers.
Intakes per month so far this calendar year:
January
170
February
135
March
197
April
144
May
181
June
205
July
168
August
155
September
123
From January to September, callers have needed support in the following areas:
Issue areas
# intakes
ID Project
271
Treatment In Prison
193
Violence/Harassment
122
Medical Care/Access
86
Employment
67
Housing
57
Immigration/Asylum
53
The team, GLAD Answers Coordinator Kayden Hall and Public Information Manager Gabrielle Hamel, holds a volunteer training every six months. We just held our latest training in September with six new volunteers joining fourteen dedicated others who have stayed with us from the previous year. These committed folks who donate their time respond to emails, phone calls, and online intakes, and provide resources and information to those in need.
Our next volunteer training will take place in the spring. You can sign up now to be contacted if you’d like to volunteer next year.
GLAD Answers
With so many wonderful volunteers, we are working to expand our reach to ensure everyone who GLAD Answers can help is aware of this free resource, particularly low-income and Black and Brown communities, as well as regions outside greater Boston. We invite you to share information about GLAD Answers with those in your community who may have questions about their legal rights or need information about addressing anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination.
How do You Use Social Media?
Social media is an indispensable part of how GLAD connects with our community. From breaking news on our work, sharing resources, announcing upcoming events, and much more, we are regularly on social networks to share and connect with you.
But as you are likely aware, there are many concerns with social media and the corporations that run them. In particular, Twitter – now called “X” – has gone through profound changes since Elon Musk acquired it in 2022. The company removed content moderation tools and fired many of the staff who enforced community guidelines. These changes to X/Twitter have led to a surge of antisemitic, racist, and anti-LGBTQ+ hate speech in their feeds.
Many people in our community are leaving the platform, but we want to make informed decisions about where we share our content based on where GLAD supporters like you spend your time online.
Please take a minute to fill out this short poll:
Social Media Survey
Goodridge and Beyond: From the First Weddings to the Supreme Court
Finally, May 17, 2004, dawned with early morning talk shows and LGBTQ+ people and allies supporting couples seeking to marry in cities and towns across the Commonwealth.
“The Massachusetts Constitution affirms the dignity and equality of all Individuals. It forbids the creation of second-class citizens.”
– Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall
The joy was palpable as Massachusetts, with the eyes of the nation on us, inaugurated the first legally-recognized marriages of same-sex couples in the country.
And still, there was work to do. There were multiple more constitutional convention sessions and lawsuits about required procedures. Most importantly, the people of the Commonwealth were engaged with their elected officials, neighbors, and family members.
Finally, the legislature conclusively rejected the last proposed constitutional amendment in June 2007 with over ¾ of the vote of the House and Senate. The Commonwealth had taken a cue from the Goodridge plaintiffs in finding common ground and our common humanity.
It was official – marriage equality was now here to stay in Massachusetts.
The legal victory and the incredible defense mounted by everyday people in Massachusetts to protect it created momentum for equality, but national progress was still infuriatingly slow.
Politicians seeking to create fear and win power seized on our community’s fight for basic dignity and human rights – something we are seeing again today. State laws were changed to ban marriage and cut off any legal protections for a couple’s relationship. Hostile politicians drove a wave of constitutional amendments across the country.
It wasn’t until 2008 that GLAD secured the next lasting court victory, at the Connecticut Supreme Court in Kerrigan and Mock v. Dept. of Public Health.We will be celebrating 15 years of marriage in Connecticut on November 12, just before the 20th anniversary of Goodridge.
After Connecticut, we began to see more state court, legislative, and ballot victories for the freedom to marry.
Crucial legislative victories for marriage equality in the New England States of Vermont, Maine, and New Hampshire proved that we could make change in the democratic process and not only the courts. We had to go back to the ballot in Maine in 2012, which then became the first state to win marriage by popular vote of the people. And in early 2013, our campaign in New England concluded with Rhode Island’s marriage enactment.
Slowly but increasingly perceptibly, more and more of the public were coming to engage the possibility of, and then embracing, the dignity and equality of LGBTQ+ individuals and our relationships.
The journey from a state constitutional law case in Massachusetts to the national marriage victory in Obergefell v. Hodges at the Supreme Court in 2015 results from the changed minds, hard work, courage, resilience, and persistence of so many across society and law. As queer historian George Chauncey has put it though, there would be no Obergefell without Goodridge, and we happily celebrate the 14 trailblazing plaintiffs who led the way.
Cementing Dignity and Equality in Federal Law
In June 2022, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas called for reconsideration of Obergefell – and other key cases protecting individual freedoms – in his concurrence in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health ruling that overturned 50 years of precedent on abortion rights. It was neither the first nor the last time we’ve seen direct threats to marriage equality, but it spurred action years in the making to require state and federal recognition of people’s marriages and forbid discrimination based on the sex, race, or ethnicity of the spouses. With bipartisan support, President Biden signed the federal “Respect for Marriage Act” in December 2022 to provide LGBTQ+ families and others across the country with the assurance that their marriages will continue to be respected by our state and federal governments.
“It takes the efforts of many to bend the arc of history toward justice… Even now there are so many places where people in our community are under attack. The work will continue, but look how far we’ve come.”
– Goodridge plaintiff Heidi Nortonsmith
We are alert to efforts to chip away at civil marriage equality and the equal status of LGBTQ+ people more broadly. This includes creating speech and religious objections to the basic rules of equal treatment, as in this summer’s narrow but alarming Supreme Court 303 Creative ruling and others. We also see it in the widespread state legislative threats to LGBTQ+ people’s making any claims to basic human or legal respect, whether in schools, healthcare settings, the public marketplace, and other areas of daily life. Our community is working overtime to defend and protect one another and affirm what we know is true and right in these extremely challenging times.
While this fight is hard, we know we can fight through losses and gaps in public understanding, as we have with marriage, with laws criminalizing intimacy, with our community’s response to the HIV epidemic, and with two decades of advances in the rights of transgender people, who are now facing devastating backlash. It is never easy or immediate, but when we work together from a place of love and commitment for the long term, we win.
“It takes the efforts of many to bend the arc of history toward justice,”Goodridge plaintiff Heidi Nortonsmith said at the White House signing ceremony for the Respect for Marriage Act. “Even now there are so many places where people in our community are under attack. The work will continue, but look how far we’ve come. The law that President Biden signs today will make people safer, more secure, and less alone. From our family to all of you, thank you for fighting for our equal humanity and dignity. For our right to love and be loved. And for our marriage.”
Unfinished Business: Ensuring Protections for Our Families
Today Massachusetts is proud of its leadership on marriage equality, and rightly so. But twenty years after the landmark Goodridge ruling, the state has unfinished business to ensure LGBTQ+ families – including our children – are fully protected by connecting them legally with their parents. Massachusetts’ statutes on establishing parentage – the legal relationship between a child and their parents – remain decades out of date. As a result, children born to LGBTQ+ families and other children born with the aid of assisted reproduction are left vulnerable, without the security of the law recognizing their relationship to their parents. We need the legislature to act this year to pass the Massachusetts Parentage Act to provide a statutory roadmap that equally protects all families.
The Justice For All Campaign
Expanding GLAD’s Capacity in A Critical Time
Since 1978, GLAD has won landmark victories to promote justice and secure essential rights. The Justice For All Campaign was launched in the fall of 2022 as an instrument to jumpstart significant growth in GLAD’s litigation ability at a time when many of our hard-won rights are under threat.
The campaign embraces GLAD’s power as a cutting-edge legal organization and our commitment to pursuing an American dream that applies to all of us. Funds from the campaign will be used to:
expand our national impact and defend our community wherever we are needed most,
grow our legal team to protect LBGTQ people and those living with HIV,
build the bench of legal leadership for the future, and
invest in our people and technology allowing GLAD to flourish in a hybrid work environment.
GLAD seeks individuals and corporations interested in driving impact for LGBTQ+ rights nationally and protecting the rights of our community with tax-deductible campaign support. We are proud to announce that to date, we have raised $1.38M towards the campaign goal of $1.85M.
We thank the following early and generous supporters for their investments in striving toward new milestones in the pursuit of justice for all and invite you to join them:
Mark Allen
Bridget Baird and Kristina Duarte
Community Action Partners
Eastern Bank Foundation
Peter Epstein
Kate and Nima Eshghi
Will Evans
Judd Flesch and Timothy Sabol
Gill Foundation
Eric C. Green
Rebecca Hart Holder and Molly Holder
The Herrman Family
Jack Hornor and Ron Skinn
Richard Iandoli
Sarah Kaplan and Anita McGahan
Joyce Kaufman and Annie Weatherwax
Dianne Phillips and Evelyn Kaupp
Andrew and Samuel Pang
Frances Pieters and Anne Guenzel
Robert and Patricia Rivers
Samantha and David Rosman
Evan Schwartz and Robert Fitterman
Jacob Smith Yang and Jason Smith
Edward Snowdon and Duffy Violante
Anne Stanback and Charlotte Kinlock
The Estate of Timothy Stein in Memory of Wayne R. Fette
Scott Webster and Peter Black
William Weiss
Richard Yurko and Jianhua Shi
Putting Your Support To Work!
GLAD is pleased to be adding a number of roles to our team this year. We will soon launch searches for new attorney positions, and the search for an Assistant Director of Planned & Individual Giving is already underway. Please reach out to our recruitment partner, Positively Partners, to learn more about either of these roles via search@positivelypartners.org and keep an eye out for the formal launch of the attorney roles in late October.
Staff Retreat in Boston
Connecting to GLAD’s Mission and Each Other
Like everyone, the COVID pandemic dramatically changed the way GLAD’s staff does our work. As we figure out how to collaborate and spend quality time across departments in a hybrid workplace, we are also facing the challenges of escalating anti-LGBTQ+ legislation and other attacks, which can take a personal toll even as they demand even more of all of us.
In early September, members of GLAD’s staff took the opportunity to get together for a full day of big-picture brainstorming and reinvesting in our connections across the organization, in order to re-energize ourselves and support each other in our ongoing fight for justice.
The passion, resilience and commitment of GLAD staff, the board and our supporters are my main motivator. I wake up each day recalling that four decades ago, those that held the same vision and values that the current staff hold created GLAD because they understood the importance of our work. It was important then, it is more important today. So, I continue to hold that torch, despite the challenging times, keeping at heart that we don’t rest until justice for all is achieved
–Qwin
I’m inspired to keep going during challenging times by remembering how GLAD’s work has impacted my life. My mom was able to marry her wife thanks to GLAD. I also think about the incredible things we’ve accomplished together, like winning the “Yes on 3” campaign to protect trans rights at the ballot box in Massachusetts.
–Beth
We spent the day sharing how we as individuals connect to GLAD‘s mission, as well as filling in the rest of our stories to each other. We talked about what inspires us to keep fighting for our communities during these challenging times, forged relationships with newer staff, and refreshed connections with colleagues we don’t often get to see in our hybrid office.
We ended our day with renewed enthusiasm for our work, appreciation for each other, and a commitment to making room in our hectic schedules for vital connection time. The quotes on this page share a few reflections from that day.
We are grateful to the coordination of GLAD Senior Manager of Organizational Culture and Community Partnerships Qwin Mbabazi and for the generous donation of a workspace by Holland Knight LLC, which made it possible for us to have room to socially distance and share this valuable time.
What we do every day can be emotionally challenging, but deeply rewarding. The fact is, our work impacts real people who are being harmed in our community. Knowing that inspires me, and working alongside people who consistently rise to the occasion with compassion and enthusiasm makes a huge difference.
–Ivory
It was really wonderful to have intergenerational and interdepartmental conversations and connections. We often stick to our own roles and don’t have time to interact with staff outside of our department or sphere, so spending time with people I don’t often get to connect with was awesome.
–Gabrielle
The activities we did and the conversations we had during this retreat really called attention to all the different roles, perspectives, and approaches needed to achieve GLAD’s mission. In this way, I felt the retreat was extremely effective in laying the groundwork for more effective and impactful cross-departmental collaboration
–Jess
What is GLAD’s Legacy Society?
What is GLAD’s Legacy Society?
There are as many ways to help the pursuit of equality as there are personalities in our community. Some are big and flashy; others are small and understated; while others are hard to describe. How you engage with GLAD is unique to you, and we appreciate that.
Among the ways you express your support for our work, a planned gift could enhance your financial well-being and be personally meaningful. In the past year, GLAD has received a variety of gifts that have done just that for the caring individuals who included GLAD in their planning through bequests, property donations, life insurance policies, retirement accounts, and securities. Collectively we refer to this group as our Legacy Society and here is a sampling of the kinds of gifts these thoughtful partners have made:
Cash Bequest
David, Gloria, and Van used cash bequests to support GLAD’s mission. They each added language to their will naming GLAD as a donation recipient. In one case it was for a specific amount; the other two were a percentage split with family and other nonprofits (also called a residual bequest).
Real Estate
Your home, vacation spot, or rental property can be donated to the organization. It will be sold or used as determined by our Board of Directors. Tim left several properties to GLAD in memory of his late partner. Proceeds from those sales will provide critical mission support for years to come.
Life Insurance
Paula had never made a gift to GLAD before, and learned about us when a family member came out as transgender. She had a life insurance policy from a former employer and made GLAD the beneficiary of the policy. Her husband said her intent was to make life easier for everyone who wants to live their authentic life.
Retirement Account
Qualified Charitable Distributions are the amount that those 70½ and older can donate to a nonprofit directly from a taxable individual retirement account instead of taking their required minimum distribution, which would have to be reported as income. Many GLAD donors take advantage of this tax savings, and after years of making these donations directly, Gary also named GLAD as the beneficiary of his retirement account.
Securities
Gifts of stock, mutual funds, and bonds may be made at any time, allowing the donor to give 20% more than selling the assets and then making a cash donation. If you have had the asset for more than a year, you will not have to pay capital gains tax when you donate it directly to a nonprofit. Karen, a long-time Equal Justice Council member, made gifts of securities during her lifetime and also left those assets to GLAD in her estate plan.
“I support GLAD because I know that GLAD’s efforts to defend human rights and preserve marriage equality will require substantial financial resources every year. Marriage equality made a real difference in my life and in the lives of so many in the LGBTQ+ community. The current legal threats from the radical right are very obvious, and GLAD provides our best defense. I am grateful for GLAD’s efforts, and I am proud to support your work.”
–Karen
If you would like to let us know about or need more information on supporting GLAD with any of these types of gifts, please contact Director of Development Carole Allen-Scannell at 617-778-6964 or callenscannell@glad.org.
Interested in joining our team and directly building growth in the LGBTQ+ and HIV justice movement? Consider applying for the position of Assistant Director of Planned & Individual Giving, and manage strategies to facilitate and grow GLAD’s individual and planned giving programs. Apply here today.
A Message from the Chief Financial Officer
GLAD’s financial health is strong.
We have 9.53 months of unrestricted reserves (i.e., net assets) as of March 31, 2023, including board designated net assets (BDNA). There is sufficient cash and investments to meet our obligations. During FY23 and in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards, our lease assets and obligations are now reflected in the Statement of Financial Position. Our financial health is both intentional and important as we make strategic investments in staff, programs, and infrastructure and face an uncertain economy and climate in FY24 and beyond.
FY23 ended with an overall decrease in net assets of $252k. For a non-profit, it is important to look at the components (see table below) and some highlights:
Net Assets: Date
1771710
Operating Fund
1770000
Board Designated
3541710
Total Unrestricted
1103295
With Donor Restrictions
4645005
Total
The unrestricted fund (without donor restrictions) is up $126k. That increase is comprised of two factors: an operating surplus of $275k and board approved spending of $149k from reserves. The ending balance of $3.6m represents 9.53 months of operating expenses.
The donor restricted fund consists of cash gifts and pledges restricted by the donor for a specific purpose or timeframe. This fund decreased by $252k, which means ‘releases’ exceeded new restricted gifts in FY23. In other words, we are ‘spending down’ our funded backlog. A reduction or increase in any year tracks the flow of funds available.
During FY23, GLAD received donated legal services of $4.2m. With this additional and significant support, we continued our litigation challenging the state bans on gender affirming care and school curriculum bans.
In FY22, GLAD received a forgivable loan from the Paycheck Protection Program in the amount of $521,565. This loan was forgiven in FY23.
We remain committed to excellence and will carefully monitor our financial results with an eye to the future.
Daniel Ball (MA) Kevin Barry (CT) James Barton (DC) Richard D. Batchelder, Jr. (MA) Prof. Courtney Beer (ME) Christopher Berry (ME) Annika Bockius-Suwyn (MA) Robert C. Boyd (DC) Brian Brenehy (CA) John T. Byrnes (DC) Catherine Cappelli (MA) Prof. Maureen Carroll (MI) Katrina Chapman (MA) Teresa Cloutier (ME) Susan Crockin (DC) Jennifer Fiorica Delgado (NY) Kathleen DeLisle (MA) Adriel Cepeda Derieux (NY) Claudine Columbres (NY) Christine Dinan (DC) Catherine J. Djang (NY) Christopher D. Dodge (MA) Douglas C. Dreier (DC) Caitlin Egleson (MA) Prof. William N. Eskridge (CT) Dawn Euer (RI) Carol Garvan (ME) Cary A. Glynn (NY) Bruce Hale (MA) Matthew Handley (DC) Christine Hansico (NH) Kathleen Hartnett (CA) Kim Havlin (NY) Cathy Harris (DC) Prof. Claudia Haupt (MA) Benjamin Hayes (DC) Lisa Hays (MA) Jordan D. Hershman (MA) John Brent Hill (DC) Brook Hopkins (MA) Kurt Hughes (VT) Dean Hutchinson (MA) Rachel Hutchinson (MA) Nathaniel J Hyman (MA) Richard Iandoli (MA) Robert Intile (MA) Richard Jones (MA) Prof. Courtney G. Joslin (CA) Jeni Kaplan (MA) Joyce Kauffman (MA)
Leon Kentworthy (DC) Jennifer A. Kirby (MA) Tiffany Knapp (MA) Katherine Knox (ME) Katherine Kraschel (CT) Arielle Kristan (MA) Kathryn Kuethman (NY) Paul Lannon (MA) David M. Lehn (DC) Sharen Litwin (MA) Gina-Marie Madow (MA) Susan Manning (DC) David Marcus (CA) Lizz Matos (MA) Lakeisha Mays (DC) John N. McClain, III (NY) Matthew McDonough (MA) Daniel McFadden (MA) Alysia Melnick (ME) Anton Metlitsky (NY) Catherine C. Miller (ME) Shannon Minter (TX) Ashley E. Moore (MA) Prof. Douglas NeJaime (CT) Juliette Niehuss (DC) Prof. Christopher Northrup (ME) Amy Null (MA) Andrew O’Connor (MA) Amy L. Pierce (CA) Amy Christine Quartarolo (CA) Tom Redburn (NJ) Nolan L. Reichl (ME) Atlee Reilly (ME) Sarah Remes (MA) G. David Rojas (IL) Theresa M. Roosevelt (DC) Alexandra Roth (NY) Kathryn Rucker (MA) Ellen Saidemen (RI) Heather Sawyer (DC) Matthe Schnall (MA) Joseph Schneiderman (CT) Alan E. Schoenfeld (NY) Stephanie Schuster (DC) Steven Schwartz (MA) Richard M. Segal (CA) Leah Segal (MA) Giovanna Shay (CT) Emily R. Shulman (MA) Steven Silver (ME)
Andrew Silvia (MA) Stephanie Simon (NY) Meg Slachetka (NY) Deirdre Smith (ME) Nathaniel R. Smith (CA) Paul M. Smith (DC) Andrew Sokol (NY) Anahita Sotoohi (ME) David Soutter (MA) Kate Stewart (MA) Christopher Stoll (CA) Jack Starcher (DC) Corin Swift (NY) Joel Thompson (MA) Karla Torres (DC) Juno Turner (NY) Adam G. Unikowsky (DC) Georgi Vogel-Rosen (RI) Jill Ward (ME) John P. Ward (RI) Sarah Warlick (DC) Ryan N. Watzel (DC) Harrison J. White (CA) Prof. Robert Williams (NJ) Nicholas Willingham (DC) Emma S. Winer (MA) Prof. Tobias Wolff (PA) Paul R.Q. Wolfson (DC) Mary Zou (NY) Melissa Hewey (ME) David Nagle (MA) Shane McCammon (DC) Seth Harrington (MA) Matthew Moses Brittany Roehrs (NY) Ethan Dowling (MA) Drew DeVoogd (MA) Courtney Herndon (MA) Katharine Foote (MA) Ariell Branson (NY) Kim Havlin (NY) Kathryn Kuethman (NY) Paula Kates (NY) Kathy Hong (NY) Sahra Nizipli (NY) Nikita Ash (NY) Samantha Kokonis (NY) Stephen Hogan-Mitchell (NY)
LAW FIRMS
Arent Fox LLP Berman & Simmons Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, PA Brianchi, Brouillard, Sousa & O’Connell, P.C. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP Center For Public Representation Cooley LLP Disability Rights Maine Foley Hoag LLP Greater Hartford Legal Aid Goodwin Procter LLP
Goodwin Procter LLP Jenner & Block King and Spalding LLP Latham & Watkins LLP Lightfoot Law Firm Lowenstein Sandler LLP MillerAsen P.A. Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP O’Melveney & Myers LLP
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP Pierce Atwood LLP Pine Tree Legal Assistance Ropes & Gray LLP Rioux, Donahue, Chmelecki & Peltier, LLC Sidley Austin LLP Sullivan & Worcester LLP White & Case LLP Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
INTERNS
Kris Berg Dan Donovan Jamie Fay Jackie George Sung Hee Lee Deaunte Johnson
Li Kane Alessandra Masso Vanessa Nguyen Natasha Novac Vinny Owen Liva Pierce
Jacob Rivera Hailey Siegel-Freedman Cashley Shepherd Leah Spingarn Dina Zingaro
VOLUNTEERS
Mario Albanese Herbert Ayesiga Dylan Berens Deepvikram Borele Nikki Burns Andrew Cardamone Patrick Ciano Nicole Collins Shirley Dulcey Ivana Durov-Balesh Chelsea Evanyke Marni Forcht Michelle Gallant Alexander Gouvin-Moffat Win Gustin Wanyi H. Michael Haley
Meredith Harris Mike Hogan Saba Ilkhani Ali Javinani Gabby Katz Amulya Kaza Emilie Khan-Boesel Irwin Krieger Karthik Krishna Jayaram Pierre-Antoine Juge Joshua Lakin Alan Leung Adam Luk Sam Mason Marc Mitchell Paul Neumann Vinny Owen
Liz O’Connor Caylee Pallatto Marina Raynis E. Reese Tony Rello Evan Rockefeller Kailash Rohatgi Jennifer Siegel Karen Silver Daniel Soszynski Corrine Summers PJ & Jesse Strachman Stacy Trosper Joseph Valle Mark Winders Jamie Zheng Dina Zingaro
INSTITUTIONAL DONORS
$100,000+ Deloitte Services LP Gill Foundation Klarman Family Foundation Wellspring Philanthropic Fund
$25,000 – $49,999 Anonymous Amalgamated Foundation Galvan Foundation Charitable Trust Krupp Family Foundation Western Digital
$10,000 – $24,999 Akamai Technologies Bain Capital The Boston Foundation Cadmus Group LLC Eastern Bank Fidelity Investments Goodwin Law Holland & Knight LLP New Hampshire Charitable Foundation Rhode Island Foundation The Ted Snowdon Foundation Wellington Management Company LLP
$5,000 – $9,999 5 Star Travel Tzell Atwater Wealth Management The Boston Bar Association
Boston IVF Boston Scientific Boston University School of Law Brown Advisory Burns & Levinson LLP Cambridge Savings Bank Choate Hall & Stewart LLP Cooley Ernst & Young (EY) Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP Foley Hoag LLP The Friendly Toast GE Goulston & Storrs Evelyn & Walter Haas, Jr. Fund Hinckley Allen Hogan Lovells US LLP Jackson Lewis PC Latham & Watkins LLP Law Offices of P. Christopher DiOrio Lawson & Weitzen LLP Mead, Talerman & Costa, LLC Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP Prince Lobel Tye LLP Robinson & Cole LLP Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Ropes & Gray Sidley Austin LLP Sun Life Assurance
Susman Godfrey LLP Vertex Pharmaceuticals WilmerHale Wolf Greenfield & Sacks PC Yurko Partners PC
$1,000 – $4,999 Susan A. & Donald P. Babson Charitable Foundation Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Bike Safe Boston Blue Cross and Blue Shield of RI Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS Brown Medicine, Inc Cabot Corporation Cerevel Therapeutics The City of Providence Freed Marcroft LLC Hirsch Roberts Weinstein Kotin, Crabtree & Strong KPMG LLP Littler Mendelson PC Locke Lord Massachusetts Commission on LGBTQ Youth National Education Association of RI Nichols, DeLisle & Lightholder, PC Shawmut Design & Construction Shepherd Financial Partners United Healthcare United Parish of Auburndale Wildflour Bakery & Cafe
EQUAL JUSTICE COUNCIL MEMBERS
$250,000+ The Estate of Tim Stein in Memory of Wayne R. Fette
$100,000 – $249,999 Eric C. Green Andrew S. & Samuel C. Pang, MD Timothy Sabol & Judd Flesch Scott Webster & Peter Black
$50,000 – $99,999 Will Evans The Herrman Family Judy Meelia Ryan Offutt & Alex Pysarets Ryan Pedlow & Cameron Kessel
$20,000 – $49,999 Anonymous (2) Joanne Herman & Terry Fallon Ralph & Janice James Anita McGahan & Sarah Kaplan Leslie Serchuck & Lynnae Schwartz William Weiss Richard J. Yurko
$10,000 – $19,999 Anonymous (5) Mary L. Bonauto & Jennifer Wriggins Nichole Bressner & Ian Wrigley Hilary Bugbee Cameron Baird Foundation Steven Carlin & Michael Cormier Mr. Matt Damon Peter J. Epstein Douglas P. Fiebelkorn & Andrew Hall Lindsay Harrison & Jonna Hamilton Rebecca Hart Holder & Molly Holder Martin Koski & James Fitzgerald Shari & Bob Levitan Gregory Lewis Judith Miles, Esq. & Renata Sos Alix Ritchie & Marty Davis Samantha Rosman & David Rosman Jack Sansolo & Dean Waller Mark D. Smith & John T. O’Keefe
$5,000 – $9,999 Anonymous (9) Mark Allen Ashley & Emily Banfield Anna Bell & Annika Bockius-Suwyn Adam Berger & Stephen Frank Peter Brady & Alan Davis Eoin Bullock Gary Buseck Darian Butcher Amelia M. Charamba & Maralyn Wheeler Prudence Crozier Bill Dickey Lisa J. Drapkin & Debbie Lewis Nima & Kate Eshghi Deborah Gaines & Jane Morgenstern Daniel Grooms David Halstead & Jay Santos Mark Heumann & John Millea Jane Hiscock & Marijean Lauzier Dennis Hong Jack Hornor & Ron Skinn Richard Iandoli & Kai Bynum Elizabeth C. Janeway Joyce Kauffman & Annie Weatherwax Lesbian Equity Foundation, Naomi Fine & Kathy Levinson Jeanne Leszczynski & Diane DiCarlo Sharen Litwin Kathryn Livelli & Wendy Hinden Mary K. Loeffelholz & Laura Green Michael Manthei Gwen Marcus & Nancy Alpert Robert McBride Paul Moreno & Stephen Barlow Betty I. Morningstar & Jeanette Kruger Jeffrey H. Munger & Robert T. Whitman O’Hanlan-Walker LGBT Equality Fund Shirley & Eric Paley James M. Pierce Scott Pomfret & Scott Whittier David J. & Nancy Poorvu Richard Rubinstein & John Morrel Jacob Smith-Yang & Jason Smith Anne Stanback & Charlotte Kinlock Lee Swislow & Denise McWilliams Mark R. Thall, M.D. & Tom Slavin Ian & Eric Tzeng Katherine & Kimberly Weir Mark R. Young & Gary Sullivan Ken & Jen Zolot
$3,000 – $4,999 Anonymous Carole & Nancy Allen-Scannell Phillip Bakalchuk Hunter Baker & Bernard Gilmore Mariterese & Patrick Balthrop Bruce W. Bastian Robert Bettiker & Robert Grundmeier Edward S.W. Boesel Kristen Bokhan Gregory Van Boven & Robert Beck Mark Brown & Kraig Kissinger Jeff Butts & Ray Cheng George Byars & Michael Spinelle Mark Cohen & Jerry Hyman David Colton & Hsein M. Khoo Stanley Cushing & Daniel Lyons Elizabeth Doherty Meryl Epstein & Trish Nuzzola Miren Etcheverry & Maureen McCarthy David Gagne & Devan Dewey Joseph Garland & Phillip Haines Christiana N. Gianopulos Paul Groipen & Todd Satterlee John D. Hancock & Jay Wood Harry Harkins & John Garger Christopher Haynes Carolyn Hotchkiss & Kathleen M. Cole Cam & Joshua Judkins Kathy Kaufmann Robert H. King & Gary C. Jordan Mark Krueger Charitable Fund at Tides Foundation Joan A. Lenane & Sally A. Rose Rob Levinson Diane K. Lincoln James Mattus & Trevor Fulmer Hirschel McGinnis & David O’Dowd Rolando Medina Kendra Moore Joyce Murdoch Julie Murtagh & Marie Porzio Beth Myers Christine Nickerson & Inga Bernstein Patricia A. Peard & Alice C. Brock David Perkins & Willem van Schalkwyk Luke Platzer Fred Ramos & Bob Starmer Sharon L. Rich & Nancy E. Reed Shaw Rietkerk Robert & Patricia Rivers Stan & Martin Sclaroff Bryan-Eric Simmons & Ralph Vetters Daniel Spring Charles Steenburg Linda Z. Swartz & Jessica W. Seaton Steven & Rebecca Taylor Kevin A. Tedeschi Kit Transue & Adrienne Shapiro Jo Trompet & David Grebber Vincent Tseng & Geoffrey Mainland Donald Vaughan & Lee Ridgway Edmund & Jane Walsh Lisa Weissmann & Deb Shapiro
$1,978 – $2,999 Anonymous (9) John Affuso Michael Albert Keplin Allwaters Janice Ambrose & Marlene Seltzer Sandy Anderson & Meg Wallace Steven Backhaus & Jay Dee Sharyn Bahn Bruce Bell & George Smart James Bennette & David Cowan Susan Bernstein Jan Bettencourt Paul Biggar Brianna Boggs & Sean Best Kelly M. Bonnevie, Esq. & Karen Kaufman Susan F. Brand, Esq Kerry Brennan David Briggs & John Benton Jean-Phillip Brignol David Brown Edward Byrne J. W. Carney, Jr. & Joy B. Rosen Joanne Casper & Wendell Colson A.M. Clark Rich Coffman Joyce Collier & Jennifer Potter Robert Crackel Brian Croteau Fred Csibi-Levin & Daniel Levin Michael Dillon Nancy Douttiel & Diane Willcox Nan Dumas
Shane Dunn & Elizabeth Bernardi & Family Betsy Ehrenberg & Beth Eisenberg Kathleen Entler & Jane Caufield Elaine Epstein Matthew Fecteau & Tristan Rushton Jessyca Feliciano & Ashley White Christopher Flynn & Daniel Newton Ralph Freidin Ken Gagne Rachel Gerstein & Karen Eisenhauer Gail E. Goodearl Barbara & Jonathan Goose Deborah Grabler Barry Guthary & Robert Evensen Sheridan Haines & Julie Crockford Dean T. Hara Bolton T. Harris, II & Robert Paul Breen George-Henry Hastie Dr. Catherine A. Hay & Kristine Clerkin Deborah Heller & Ann Sanders Kenneth Hirschkind Sonia Hofkosh Michael J. Izdepski & James Couchon Amanda Johnston & Allison Sigrist Arthur Kaplan & Duane Perry John M. Kelly Steve Kennedy Ryan Kerr Wendy Kirchick Karen Kruskal & Sheera Strick Stewart J. Landers, Esq. G. Lee & Diana Humphrey Stanley Lewicki Maria Lopez Keith J. MacDonald & Thomas P. Webber Matt Maguire Sara Malconian & Katherine Truscott Marc Maxwell Kenneth H. Mayer, M.D. Matthew McTygue & Todd Rivers David Mills Neal Minahan Jessica Mink Frank C. Mockler & Stephen J. Griffin Marianne Monte & Lisa Carcieri Alexandria Mooney Joe & Benjamin Muller Kathy Mulvey & Patricia Lambert David O’Brien Rosemary Palladino & Marianne Brennick Deborah & Ron Peeples José F. Portuondo & Maria L. Wilson-Portuondo William Powell Oliver Radford & Stephen C. Perry Naynay Rivers Elizabeth Rosen & Pam Cobey Carol Rosensweig, Esq. & Charlene D. Grant Jill & Jane Rothenberg-Simmons Elisabeth Sackton & Liz Coolidege Matthew Sample Jess & Robbie Samuels Linda Serafini & Cathy Welsh Mark Serchuck & John Casso Mark Sexton & Kirk Wallace Fund of Stonewall Community Foundation Karen Shack Matthew Shakespeare & Fritz Backus Joanne Shapiro Paul Silva Julia Slee & Beth Grierson Clifford Sloan & Mary Lou Hartman Joseph Smith & Scott Popkowski Andrew Sorbo Randall Steere Caleb P. Stewart Michael Sweeney Matthew Teague Aaron Tievsky Gail Tsimprea & Francine M. Benes Thomas G. J. Trykowski, AIA & Joseph Cacciola Geoffrey W. Tuba Rich Van Loan Joyce Vyriotes Ellen Wade, Esq. & Maureen Brodoff, Esq. Andrew Wang Arthur E. Webster, Esq. John Welch Elizabeth Welsh & Amy Brodigan Jo Ann Whitehead & Bette Jo Green Janson Wu & Adam Levine Rodney L. Yoder & Michael J. Piore
LEGACY SOCIETY MEMBERS
Anonymous (4) Carole & Nancy Allen-Scannell Carol Alms Jeff Anderson & Richard Schultz Amy Aulwes & Warren Zola Michael Baeder & David Wimberly Sharyn Bahn Gloria & Linda Bailey-Davies Dawn Baumer & Rosie Hartzler Bruce Bell & George Smart Robert Bettiker & Robert Grundmeier Linda Betzer Dan Borges & David Hayter Dr. Stephen Boswell & John Neale Eva Boyce Peter Brady & Alan Davis Shelley Brauer & Jean Hey Ann Briley Bill Brindamour David Brown Dr. Paula G. Carmichael & Rev. Richelle Russell David Cash Patience Crozier & Jessica R. Keimowitz Stanley Cushing & Daniel Lyons Laura Diamond & Carolyn McDonald Abby & Mary Diamond-Kissiday Lisa J. Drapkin & Debbie Lewis Nan Dumas Shane Dunn & Elizabeth Bernardi & Family Peter J. Epstein Suzanne Estler Adam Feinberg Julia Fitz-Randolph Lesbian Innovations Fund at The Women’s Foundation of CO Robert Flavell & Ronald Baker Elizabeth Forrest & Leslie Horst David F. Freedman Christine Gestay John Giso
Gail E. Goodearl The Estates of Gloria Guarino & Van Chumacas Holly Gunner & Anne Chalmers Dean T. Hara Harry Harkins & John Garger Christopher Hartley & Micah Buis Warren Hathaway & Ross Sneyd Deborah Heller & Ann Sanders Joanne Herman & Terry Fallon Marcie Hershman Gavin Hilgemeier Joan Hilty Kenneth Hirschkind Jack Hornor & Ron Skinn Rabbi Devorah Jacobson & Ms. Margaret Mastrangelo John Kane Joyce Kauffman & Annie Weatherwax Terence Keane & Douglas Hughes Robert H. King & Gary C. Jordan Paul Kowal Richard LaCroix Linda Lankowski & Christine Jablonski Arthur Lipkin & Robert Ellsworth Marie Longo & Allison Bauer Tony Maida & Anthony Volpe Bruce Mandeville Barbara L. Margolis, Esq. & Colleen J. Gregory, Ph.D. Daniel Mauk & Mitchell Sendrowitz Marc Maxwell Richard D. McCarthy & Franc Castro Jr. Laura McMurry Brian McNaught & Raymond Struble Robert Minnocci Paul Moreno & Stephen Barlow Jeffrey H. Munger & Robert T. Whitman Allan Nault Andrew S. & Samuel C. Pang, MD
Lynne E. Panico Trevor Paulson Patricia A. Peard & Alice C. Brock Janet Peck & Carol Conklin Kirk Pessner & Russ Miller Mark Philibert & David Rooks Scott Pomfret & Scott Whittier Brian Quint Chris Rainville Nick & Sian Robertson Richard Rubinstein & John Morrel Takoma Sampson & Leah Whaley-Holmes Jess & Robbie Samuels Arnold Sapenter & Joseph Reed Robert Seletsky Robert Sessions Mary & Jean B. Sevarese Joanne Shapiro Diane Smith Tony Smith & David Ovalle Andrew Sorbo Trina Soske & Sarah Yedinsky Scott Squillace, Esq. Anne Stanback & Charlotte Kinlock Kenneth Stilwell Amalie Tuffin & Laura Lewis Anthony Volponi Herbert Walcoe Robert Wasson Karen & Marilyn Watson-Etsell Kendall Watts & Robert Derry Katherine & Kimberly Weir Lisa Weissmann & Deb Shapiro Tim Wernette Jo Ann Whitehead & Bette Jo Green Robert Wiggins David Yalen Peter Zupcofska & Robert Wilson
SUSTAINERS CIRCLE MEMBERS
Anonymous (11) Brenda Abrams Norma Adler & Susan Torrey John Affuso Gavin & Angelo Alexander Sandy Anderson & Meg Wallace Melanie Andrade & Kathy Wittman John Argos & Robert G. Ross Paul & Douglas Asher-Best Carter Aubrey Bryn Austin & Elizabeth Carver Tamara Baca Gloria & Linda Bailey-Davies Mariterese & Patrick Balthrop Ian Barnacle Bill Bartels Bruce W. Bastian Michael Behrendt Richard Bernache Merle Bicknell & Jackie Gelb Paul Biggar Stephen Boehmke Kristen Bokhan Linda Bonelli Mohan Boodram & Robert Morris Celia Bozsum Carrie Braverman & Evelyn Arinne Braverman Lynne Brilliant & Wanda Shelton Mark Brimhall Mark Brown & Kraig Kissinger Ellen Bunch Kenneth Busch Kathleen Bush & Mary Ritchie Edward Byrne Bruce Callahan & Tom Gagnon J. W. Carney, Jr. & Joy B. Rosen Susan Casavant Richard Caswell Bonnie Catena Christopher Cerami Albert Chan & Richard Possemato Alexandra Chandler Terri Charles Marjorie Charney David Chase & Gerard Cortinez Huichun Chen Lindsey Cimochowski & Bradley Rufleth Frank Cincotti Tina Cincotti Truitt Clark Lisa Cogliandro & Amanda Zuretti Ilene Cohen & Susan Jacoby Bradley Cohen Lynn Colangione & Lauren Baskin Katharine Colleran David Colton & Hsein M. Khoo Edward Cook Amy & Garth Coombs Jack Cox & Edwin Light David Cruz & Steve Greene Marla Cummins Shamim Dada Ellen C Davis Stanley Davis Elena Degago Duane Dietz Adrienne DiPrima Brian Distelberg Kelly Douglas Daniel Dupuis Betsy Ehrenberg & Beth Eisenberg Nicholas Eustis Susan Fahlund & Nancy LaPelle Dan Ferrell Timothy & Amber Fisher Virginia Fitzgerald Christopher Flynn & Daniel Newton Edward Ford & Gilbert Arenaza Anna Ford & Sara Watson Anne Fowler & Samuel Allen William Gabovitch Marcia Garber Robert Geary & Phi Hung Do Mary Gentile & Mary Jacobsen Yasmin Ghassab Matthew Gibson Saar Gill Zachary & Gretchen Gingo Gilbert Glick-Macalalad & Alex Macalalad Jeffrey Goldsmith Barbara & Jonathan Goose Timothy Gordon Gordon Gottlieb & Rob Krikorian
Sean Graham Emily Gregoire Bradley Gregory Pat Grimm & Christina Klein Amy Grundvig Julienne Guerrero & Karen Zeman Barry Guthary & Robert Evensen Noe Gutierrez Jimmy Haber Caryl Haddock Sheridan Haines & Julie Crockford Lynn Halpern Roberta Hambleton Jeffery Hammerberg Erin Harper Deborah Heller & Ann Sanders Deanna A Hence & Ryan Georgi Gavin Hilgemeier Christopher Hines Kenneth Hirschkind Dan Hochman & Martin Borys Lenore Horner D. Austin Horowitz & Mark Vigorito Christopher Hossfeld Spencer Icasiano Thomas Ingle & Lee Stovall Samantha Janosick Colette Jaycox Suriya Jeyadalan, M.D. & Cora Jeyadame Michael Johnson Jeffrey Jones & Mark Secord Neal Kass Peter Kassel & Thomas Tostengard Joyce Kauffman & Annie Weatherwax C. Keith & Stephen Simpson Connor Kennedy Stephen Kerrigan Nicole Kinsley Wendy Kirchick David & Kristina Kirkham Brad & Flint Kleinerman-Gehre Jim Klopper Leah & Jahna Knobler Vincent Kornell Jeffrey Kosbie Michella Kras Sophie & John Krentzman Todd Kreps & Scott Best John Kyper Marc LaCasse & Todd Katzman KitKat LaGines Stacy LaiFook Stewart J. Landers, Esq. Robert Landino & Douglass Belote Betty Landry John Lapin Gregory Larsen Jane Lea & Jennifer Shannon Erica LeBow & Megan Rising Jose Lebron Dana Leslie Jeanne Leszczynski & Diane DiCarlo Annmarie Levins & Linda Severin Lin Lin Justin Littman Julie Lonergan Paige Lowe Stephanie Lowitt & Mason Weintraub Kelly Ryan Lucas Crissy Luna Keith J. MacDonald & Thomas P. Webber Kat MacDonald & Suzanne Abair Ronald Madson & Richard Dietz John Mandeville & Doug Lester Christian Manke Barbara L. Margolis, Esq. & Colleen J. Gregory, Ph.D. J.E. Martin & Denise Howard Andrew Martinez Lois Mason & Christine Coughlan Barbara J. Mathews Kenneth H. Mayer, M.D. Jason McCoy Marly McGrath Meghan McGrath Nancy McLane & Karen Click Vered Meir Torr Melling Michael Michael Ellen Miller Lisa Miller David Mills Kathleen Mills-Curran Jessica Mink
Frank C. Mockler & Stephen J. Griffin Kendra Moore John Morrill Kristina Morton Fredric Moscowitz & John Stella Francis Mule Merkle Muller Kathy Mulvey & Patricia Lambert Niclas Nagler Paul Neumann James Newman Christine Nickerson & Inga Bernstein Sean Olbert Brandon Orden David Owens & Dennis Morin Jennifer Parks Olivia Parriott Emily Pate Andre Penn Alton Phillips Alexa Phomphakdy Suzannah Pogue & Sandra Jones José F. Portuondo & Maria L. Wilson-Portuondo Robert Quinan & Steve Waddell Emma Quinn-Judge Chris Rainville Vincent Reardon Michelle Rediker & Sue Wedda Amy Michelle Reinkemeyer Brian P. Rice & Jason D. Kelliher Maria L. Rico Elisabeth Sackton & Liz Coolidege Matthew Sample Jess & Robbie Samuels David Sander Andrew Sayer Kristin Schiff Teresa Schubert Johanna Schulman & Moira S. Barrett Charles Screws Sandra Seaman Jessica Selinkoff Erin Semagin Damio Alison & Jordan Shea El Sher Deanna Sheridan Bryan-Eric Simmons & Ralph Vetters Alix Simonetti & Juliett Crawford Julia Slee & Beth Grierson Gary Slossberg Mary Grace Smith Sarah Smith Paige Snelgrove Kenneth Snyder Andrew Sorbo Trina Soske & Sarah Yedinsky Randi Stein Kathleen Stevens Jessie Stickgold-Sarah & Robert Kindel Stephan Stoeckl Mark Sullivan & Albert Amodeo Todd Swisher Mandy & Leti Taft-Pearman Laura Tenny Shaunya Thomas Kirk Thompson Nicole Thomte Carol Thornber Thomas G. J. Trykowski, AIA & Joseph Cacciola Ian & Eric Tzeng Gregory Van Boven & Robert Beck Donald Vaughan & Lee Ridgway John Voight Robert Volk & Kit Mui David Walker Caitlin Walsh John P. Ward & Alain Balseiro Lynsii Ward Mark Weiss John Welch Linda Werner Stacy Wetherhold Michelle Wiener Mark Wilen Adam Williams Jody Wilson Nicholas Winston Jim Witmer & Randall Meyer Elizabeth Wohler Pamela Wood Stephenie Yeung & Alice De Young Kathryn Zin
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.