Skip Header to Content
GLAD Logo Skip Primary Navigation to Content

News

Women’s, Healthcare, and Human Rights Organizations Urge 6th Circuit to Reinstate Block on Transgender Health Bans in TN, KY

Friend-of-the-court brief argues bans on access to care for transgender adolescents constitute sex discrimination and are subject to heightened scrutiny, which the laws fail

GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC), Campaign for Southern Equality, and eleven other women’s, healthcare and LGBTQ+ organizations filed an amicus, or friend-of-the-court, brief in the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Sixth Circuit urging reinstatement of the court order preventing enforcement of transgender healthcare bans for adolescents in Tennessee and Kentucky while the legal challenges to those bans continue.

The brief argues that Tennessee and Kentucky state laws prohibiting doctors from providing healthcare to transgender adolescents discriminate on the basis of sex, and are therefore subject to heightened judicial scrutiny. These bans target transgender adolescents to deny them care, even when they, their doctors, and their parents agree it is essential for their health. Such laws reflect hostility and serve only to harm young people.

The Sixth Circuit panel’s order allowing the Tennessee and Kentucky bans to go into effect despite pending legal challenges means transgender adolescents can’t get the care they need and their parents are blocked from acting in their children’s best interests.

The Sixth Circuit is an outlier among courts to consider laws denying healthcare access to transgender adolescents. District court judges in seven states to consider such bans, including Tennessee and Kentucky, as well as the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals  have found in preliminary proceedings that such bans violate the constitutional rights of transgender people and cause immediate, irreparable harms. A federal judge in Arkansas, the first to issue a final ruling, has now blocked that state’s ban permanently.

The amici are organizations committed to ensuring everyone, including women and LGBTQ+ people, can access the healthcare they need. In addition to GLAD and NWLC, the organizations joining the friend-of-the-court brief are Campaign for Southern Equality, Equality Federation, Family Equality, Human Rights Campaign, Memphis Center for Reproductive Health, National Center for Transgender Equality, OUTMemphis, Southern Legal Counsel, Southern Poverty Law Center, Tennessee Equality Project, Trevor Project, and White Coats for Trans Youth. The brief was filed by Jenner & Block LLP.

Visit the case page and read the brief.

L.W. v. Skrmetti and Doe v. Thornbury

GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC), Campaign for Southern Equality and eleven other women’s, healthcare and LGBTQ+ organizations filed an amicus, or friend-of-the-court, brief in the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Sixth Circuit urging reinstatement of the court order preventing enforcement of transgender healthcare bans for adolescents in Tennessee and Kentucky while the legal challenges to those bans continue.

The brief argues that Tennessee and Kentucky state laws prohibiting doctors from providing healthcare to transgender adolescents discriminate on the basis of sex, and are therefore subject to heightened judicial scrutiny. These bans target transgender adolescents to deny them care, even when they, their doctors and their parents agree it is essential for their health. Such laws reflect hostility and serve only to harm young people.

The amici are organizations committed to ensuring everyone, including women and LGBTQ+ people, can access the healthcare they need, In addition to GLAD and NWLC, the organizations joining the friend-of-the-court brief are:

  • Campaign for Southern Equality
  • Equality Federation
  • Family Equality
  • Human Rights Campaign
  • Memphis Center for Reproductive Health
  • National Center for Transgender Equality,
  • OUTMemphis
  • Southern Legal Counsel
  • Southern Poverty Law Center
  • Tennessee Equality Project
  • Trevor Project
  • White Coats for Trans Youth

L.W. v. Skrmetti was filed by the ACLU, ACLU of Oklahoma, and Lambda Legal. Doe v. Thornbury was filed by the ACLU of Kentucky and National Center for Lesbian Rights.

Curb Records v. Lee

UPDATE: On May 17, in a separate case brought by the ACLU of Tennessee, a federal judge issued a ruling striking the law on First Amendment grounds.

On June 30, 2021, renowned independent record label Curb Records and the Mike Curb Foundation filed a federal lawsuit challenging a new Tennessee law, HB 1182, that requires businesses to post a demeaning notice on their premises if they have policies allowing access for transgender individuals on an equal basis to other patrons.

The complaint asserts that HB 1182 – which designates precise dimensions, red and yellow coloring and specific language amounting to a “not welcome” sign to patrons – promotes a hostile climate for LGBT people in the state and denies them equal access to businesses open to the public as well as to employment and educational opportunities. Curb Records and the Mike Curb Foundation argue that the law compels them and other Tennessee businesses to endorse a climate of fear and nonacceptance of LGBT people, in contradiction to their company values of integrity, respect for diversity and nondiscrimination.

Curb Records and the Mike Curb Foundation are represented in their suit by Sherrard Roe Voigt & Harbison, attorney Abby Rubenfeld, the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), and GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD).

Read GLAD’s statement on the filing.

en_USEnglish