News

Home » Maine

Maine Legislature Rejects Bills Targeting Transgender Student Athletes

AUGUSTA – The Maine Legislature rejected eight bills on Monday that targeted transgender student athletes, the transgender community and the Maine Human Rights Act. A broad coalition came together to organize in response, including equality organizations, health care providers, legal advocacy groups and everyday Mainers of all ages and backgrounds.

“Thousands of Maine people showed up at the State House, called and emailed their legislators and stood strong against eight different bills that targeted our community,” said Gia Drew, Executive Director of EqualityMaine. “We are grateful for the members of the Maine Legislature who listened and helped to defeat these harmful bills. Our community is resilient, and we want every transgender person in Maine to know that they are loved, that they are not alone, and that we will stand with them.”

The Legislature considered and rejected eight bills:

LD 233, An Act to Prohibit Biological Males from Participating in School Athletic Programs and Activities Designed for Females When State Funding is Provided to the School;
LD 868, An Act to Ensure Equity and Safety in Athletics, Restrooms, Changing Rooms and Housing at Elementary, Secondary and Postsecondary Schools;
LD 1002, An Act to Protect Children’s Identification by Requiring Public Schools to Use the Name and Gender Specified on a Child’s Birth Certificate;
LD 1134, An Act to Prohibit Males from Participating in Female Sports or Using Female Facilities;
LD 1704, An Act to Prohibit a School Administrative Unit from Adopting a Policy that Allows a Student to Use a Restroom Designated for Use by the Opposite Sex.
LD 1337, An act to Amend Maine Human Rights Act Regarding Female Athletes and Safety in Women’s Single-sex Shelters;
LD 1432, An Act to Remove Consideration of Gender Identity from the Maine Human Rights Act; and
LD 380, An Act to Amend Certain Laws Regarding Gender-affirming Health Care Services

“Maine voters made clear 20 years ago that it’s wrong to discriminate against someone because they are transgender, and the Maine Law Court weighed in in 2014 to affirm that schools must treat transgender students equally, including access to school bathrooms or locker rooms,” said Mary Bonauto, Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD Law).

“Let’s be clear – these bills were a direct attack on our rights, our dignity and our lives,” said Bre Danvers Kidman, co-director of MaineTransNet. “Our community rose up, stood shoulder to shoulder with allies across the state and shut them down. Transgender people do not exist to be used as a political wedge issue. Our civil rights are not up for debate. We are not going away. We know who we are, we know what we deserve and we will never stop fighting to live safe, free, and visible in every part of this state.”

More than 900 Maine people testified against efforts to deny trangender students access to health care and ban them from participating in school sports during a public hearing in May. The hearing drew an extraordinary cross-section of our state — parents, educators, fellow students, current and former athletes, faith leaders, and more — all united in defense of dignity, fairness, and inclusion. Their testimony reflected a clear consensus: these attacks do not reflect Maine values and have no place in our laws.

“Transgender student athletes are being targeted by some of the richest and most powerful men in the world. We are thankful for the tremendous work of our allies in the Legislature who stood up for what is right, and for the members of the trans community who told their stories and demonstrated the harm these terrible bills would have caused,” said Destie Hohman Sprague, Executive Director of the Maine Women’s Lobby.

“Every student should be treated with kindness and respect, and they should be able to attend school and play sports without fear. These bills wouldn’t have just hurt transgender girls, they would have hurt everyone and subjected all Maine girls to invasive procedures that violate personal privacy,” said Sue Campbell, Executive Director of OUT Maine.

The coalition remains united and prepared to respond to future threats to equality and human rights in Maine. As efforts to roll back protections or target vulnerable communities continue to surface across the country, advocates, organizations, and community members across the state stand ready to defend Maine’s values of compassion, courage and humanity.

Defending Voters’ Rights in Maine

Home » Maine

Update: LD1149 died in committee in May 2025.

The ability to participate in elections is fundamental. It is of the utmost performance that every person can make their voice heard at the ballot box. However, LD1149 would make it more difficult — and for some people, practically impossible — to vote.

“An Act to Require an Individual to Present Photographic Identification for the Purposes of Voting” is a voter suppression referendum that will keep eligible voters from being able to actively participate in our political process. Among other issues, LD1149 would eliminate ongoing absentee ballots, cut the time period for early absentee voting by two days, impose barriers to the use of secure ballot drop-off boxes, and prevent voters from requesting an absentee ballot over the phone. In addition, LD1149 would require voters to provide photo ID from a restrictive list of acceptable forms of ID every time they vote.

GLAD Law submitted testimony in opposition to LD1149 highlighting the barriers photo ID requirements and restricted absentee voting and early voting will have on all Mainers, especially on transgender voters. Read our testimony to learn more.

GLAD Law is a member of the Save Maine Absentee Voting Coalition, a diverse, nonpartisan group of organizations from across Maine who believe that fair, open, and accessible elections are the cornerstone of our democracy.

Protecting Human Rights and Transgender Youth in Maine

Home » Maine

Update: Victory! On June 16, 2025, the Maine Legislature rejected eight bills that targeted transgender student athletes, the transgender community, and the Maine Human Rights Act. Learn more.

Our schools should create a supportive environment where every student can receive an education and participate in school activities.

But several bills have been filed this session that would single out transgender young people for exclusion, roll back nondiscrimination protections, and open the door to harassment and bullying of all Maine girls.

Tell your lawmakers to oppose harmful bills and protect transgender youth and human rights in Maine!

Check out the full advocacy toolkit for more ways to make a difference.

Racially Inclusive Curriculum in Maine

Home » Maine

For decades, scholars and educators have recognized the value of a “windows and mirrors” approach to teaching, where a school curriculum can serve as a “mirror” reflecting a student’s own background back to them, or as a “window” into other identities and traditions. These window and mirror effects are all the more important when young people have few opportunities to see their lives, culture, and history mirrored back to them or shared with their peers.

GLAD Law submitted testimony in support of LD957, LD1202, and LD1474, bills that will strengthen and further integrate the teaching of Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander history, African American studies, and Wabanaki studies in Maine schools. GLAD Law’s testimony describes how racially inclusive school curriculum can foster a sense of belonging and community among students, increase educational achievements for all students, and prepare youth with the knowledge they need to participate in our democracy and succeed in an increasingly diverse society.

Education Discrimination Remedies in Maine

Home » Maine

Unlawful discrimination is extraordinarily harmful for all people, especially students. These harms have a lasting impact that deprives young people of equal opportunities to grow, learn and succeed—and deprives us all of those young people’s unique insights, talents, and contributions.

LD1647, “An Act to Amend the Maine Human Rights Act to Provide Additional Remedies for Educational Discrimination,” would make compensatory damages available for students who can prove they have experienced unlawful educational discrimination. These damages were historically available under federal law until 2022, when the U.S. Supreme Court severely limited remedies. Now, students must rely on the Maine Human Rights Act (MHRA) to protect them. However, the modest civil penalties provided under the MHRA are not enough to cover the costs of litigation or compensate victims for the harms they have suffered.

LD 1647 is a common-sense bill that restores the status quo as it existed before 2022 when the damages were available, and in doing so reaffirms Maine’s commitment to building an education system where all students can thrive.

Read the testimony from GLAD Law and the ACLU of Maine to learn more.

Expanding Access to HIV Prevention in Maine

Home » Maine

With HIV cases rising due to an active HIV outbreak in Bangor and federal funding for HIV prevention under threat, we must act boldly at the state level to preserve access to proven, cost-effective prevention strategies.

GLAD Law along with over 60 community organizations, public health advocates, constituents, and individuals submitted testimony in support of LD1687, “An Act to Clarify and Increase Access to HIV Prevention Medications.” This bill would builds on the 2021 law allowing people to access PrEP and PEP directly from a pharmacist without a prescription.

LD1687 will expand access to HIV prevention across Maine by addressing reimbursement for pharmacists, enabling pharmacists to administer long-acting injectable forms of PrEP, and ensuring insurance coverage of injectable PrEP.

Syringe Service Programs in Maine

Home » Maine

Maine is currently facing a public health crisis due to an outbreak of HIV in Bangor. Syringe service programs are an important element in ending the HIV epidemic, and GLAD Law is working in Maine to increase access to these programs and ensure best practices are met.

LD219 “An Act to Limit Hypodermic Apparatus Exchange Programs to a One-for-one Exchange”

Update: Victory! On April 17, 2025, LD219 died in committee.

GLAD Law submitted testimony in opposition to LD219, a bill that would worsen public health outcomes by creating a one-for-one limit for syringe exchange programs. One-for-one needle exchange programs limit syringe distribution by requiring participants to return a needle before they are given a new one. These programs have been found to be less effective at reducing the number of people reusing syringes.

GLAD Law’s testimony advocates for comprehensive harm reduction strategies, including community clean-up efforts, safe disposal programs, and education initiatives, to address concerns around syringe litter while remaining responsive to public health needs.

LD1078 “An Act to Support Maine’s Public Health Objectives by Increasing Access to Hypodermic Apparatus Exchange Programs”

GLAD Law joined the Frannie Peabody Center in submitting testimony in support of LD1078, legislation that would increase access to life-saving care through syringe service programs. LD1078 would allow providers of syringe service programs to operate at multiple locations within a county under one license. This flexibility would increase access to care, enhance staff capacity, and increase the accessibility of safe disposal sites.

Pride Portland

Home » Maine

Pride Portland

Saturday, June 21 | Portland, ME | Learn more

Celebrate pride with GLAD Law at the Pride Portland Parade & Festival.

Pride Portland! brings people together from all over the US and beyond for an annual parade and festival in downtown Portland, Maine to celebrate and honor the accomplishments of the LGBTQ+ movement, to raise awareness of the community’s ongoing struggles, and to foster an environment of inclusivity, accessibility, and solidarity.

Learn more

St. Dominic Academy et al. v. Makin

Home » Maine

The state of Maine runs a program that provides state funds to support students who attend a private school when the school district where they live does not have its own high school. In 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Carson v. Makin that the program must apply to religious schools.

Maine now requires all schools receiving public funds to abide by the educational nondiscrimination provisions of the Maine Human Rights Act. Two religious schools filed lawsuits in Maine federal district court claiming the application of the Human Rights Act provisions to them violates their free exercise of religion. The District Court denied both challenges, and the schools have appealed to the First Circuit Court of Appeals.

GLAD Law joined with Lambda Legal on a friend-of-the-court brief to make two broad points: 1. The Carson v. Makin decision does not control in this case, and 2. Maine has compelling state interests in requiring compliance with the MHRA.

News

Home » Maine

Advocates Respond to U.S. Department of Justice Lawsuit Against State of Maine for Failures in Maine’s Children’s Behavioral Health System

The suit comes after more than two years of negotiations between the parties

Augusta – Today, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed suit against the State of Maine based on its June 2022 findings that Maine discriminated against youth with disabilities by failing to maintain an adequate system of behavioral health services that prevent institutionalization. The lawsuit comes after settlement negotiations broke down.

“Twenty-five years after the landmark Supreme Court decision Olmstead v. L.C., which found that unnecessarily segregating people with disabilities into institutional settings violates the Americans with Disabilities Act, Maine children and their families are still waiting for a legally compliant behavioral health system. And despite calls for more than a decade to ensure the availability of those services, Maine has failed to do so. Unfortunately, this lawsuit was the necessary result of that continued failure,” said Atlee Reilly, Managing Attorney, Disability Rights Maine.

After initially receiving a complaint filed by Disability Rights Maine, the U.S. DOJ conducted a lengthy investigation and found:

“Maine’s community-based behavioral health system fails to provide sufficient services. As a result, hundreds of children are unnecessarily segregated in institutions each year, while other children are at serious risk of entering institutions.”
“Children are unable to access behavioral health services in their homes and communities—services that are part of an existing array of programs that the State advertises to families through its Medicaid program (MaineCare), but does not make available in a meaningful or timely manner.”
“Maine children with behavioral health needs are eligible and appropriate for the range of community-based services the State offers, but either remain in segregated settings or are at serious risk of institutionalization.”
“Families and children in Maine are overwhelmingly open to receiving services in integrated settings. In fact, parents indicated a strong preference that their children receive services at home due to trauma, neglect, and abuse that their children reportedly endured in residential facilities within and outside of Maine.”

Those findings should not have been a surprise to the State of Maine, which had been on clear notice of the widespread inadequacy of its community-based behavioral health system for children when a comprehensive assessment concluded, in 2018, that children’s behavioral health services were not available when needed, or not available at all. Two years later, a separate independent assessment of the juvenile justice system found that many youth are detained and incarcerated at Long Creek because they could not access appropriate community-based services for their behavioral and mental health needs.

What was true in 2018 remains true today- Maine continues to fail to ensure that children with disabilities have access to the community-based behavioral health services they need in their homes and communities. As a result, children with disabilities in Maine are unnecessarily institutionalized in residential facilities, including at Long Creek and in other residential facilities both inside and outside the state, severing their ties to family and community. This violates their right, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, to receive services in the most integrated settings appropriate to their needs.

“When kids can access treatment and support close to home, they can stay connected with their families and communities,” said ACLU of Maine Legal Director Carol Garvan. “Unfortunately, for far too long, Maine has not ensured these services. Since 2016, we have been working to address human rights violations at Long Creek, but not enough has been done. Maine must provide its kids the services they need to live healthy and safe lives.”

“Maine children with disabilities and their families deserve what the law requires, which is community-based behavioral health services. The failure to provide those services harms children, strains and fragments families, and ripples across communities. Maine can and must step up to meet its obligations with the services the law requires,” said Mary Bonauto, Senior Director at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders.

As the U.S. DOJ indicated in its complaint,

“Maine can implement reasonable modifications so that children with behavioral health disabilities can live and thrive in integrated settings instead of entering institutions to access care.”
“But instead of modifying its service system to prevent and resolve unnecessary segregation, Maine has prioritized expanding its institutional services.”

Read the DOJ press release.