CHRO and Dana Peterson v. City of Hartford
Update The Connecticut Appeals Court sided with the City of Hartford, ruling on September 18, 2012, that the trial court improperly reversed the original finding of the CHRO referee. Peterson’s petition to have the case reviewed by the Connecticut Supreme Court was denied, leaving her with no further recourse and ending the matter.
GLAD participated in the appeal of a Connecticut Commission on Human Rights (CHRO) finding against a police sergeant, Dana Peterson, who was denied a position as a canine handler – a coveted and publicly visible position within the force – because she is transgender. The Connecticut Superior Court issued an initial ruling that the CHRO referee ignored serious evidence of discrimination. The City of Hartford appealed that decision in the Connecticut Appeals Court. GLAD filed an amicus brief in the case, and oral argument took place Tuesday, November 29, 2011.
The Hartford Courant: Transgender Police Officer Still Fighting for Equality
Making Change Outside the CourtsRead More
GLAD uses a combination of powerful legal, policy, and advocacy tools to advance racial, economic, and LGBTQ+ justice.
Soule et al v CT Association of Schools et alRead More
On October 14, 2021, GLAD filed a friend-of-the-court (amicus) brief along with the National Center for Transgender Equality…
Give Local on Give OUT DayRead More
For Give OUT Day this year, learn about organizations doing important work impacting LGBTQ+ people near you.