A.E.H. v. M.R.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled unanimously September 28, 2012 that Massachusetts must recognize other states’ parallel spousal statuses for same-sex couples, such as California registered domestic partnerships. Under the ruling, both spouses are the legal parents to children born into such unions.
GLAD served as lead appellate counsel in this case before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) concerning the parentage of two children born into a California registered domestic partnership (RDP). The Massachusetts Probate and Family Court ruled that both parties are equal legal parents for the two children and, pursuant to established child custody standards, awarded our client, A.E.H., primary physical custody. GLAD continues to argue that Massachusetts should respect the legal spousal status granted by the RDP and extend to couples who have established that status the full scope of spousal protections, including those related to children born into the relationship and the ability to dissolve the relationship.
Oral argument took place before the SJC on May 8, 2012.
We can do the impossible. We already have.Read More
20 years ago, marriage equality seemed impossible. But we did it. And together, we will do the impossible again.
Parents, Advocates, and Lawmakers Testify for Stronger Family Legal ProtectionsRead More
Parents, advocates, and lawmakers testified in support of the Massachusetts Parentage Act to strengthen legal protections for children and families.
Celebrating Two Decades of Marriage Equality on the Anniversary of the Landmark Goodridge v. Department of Public Health RulingRead More
For the 20th anniversary of the groundbreaking Massachusetts Supreme Court ruling, GLAD presents the 2023 Spirit of Justice Award to the Goodridge plaintiffs.