Bedford and Breen v. New Hampshire Technical College System
Status: Victory
The state of New Hampshire dropped its appeal in this case on May 7, 2007, providing a definitive victory for GLAD and the plaintiffs. The New Hampshire Superior Court ruled on May 3, 2006, that the denial of insurance and leave benefits to the families of two New Hampshire state employees constituted both disparate treatment and disparate impact violations of the New Hampshire law against sexual orientation discrimination in employment.
GLAD had appealed the ruling of the Commission for Human Rights that the complainants were being treated the same as unmarried heterosexual employees and that state law prevented the Commission from considering the employees’ claim that the use of a marriage requirement for benefits is discriminatory.
Related Content
-
NH Senate Tables Bill That Would Have Rolled Back Some Transgender Nondiscrimination Protections
Read MoreAdvocates thank New Hampshire state senators and ask them to apply the same logic to HB396
-
Advocates Respond to Arguments in Federal Challenge to NH Classroom Censorship Law
Read MoreThe “banned concepts” law creates an unconstitutional barrier to discussions of race, gender, disability, and LGBTQ+ topics in schools and public workplaces.
-
Transgender Worker Denied Equal Benefits Challenges Discrimination by Turbocam, Inc. and Two Harvard Pilgrim Companies
Read MoreLillian Bernier is simply asking for fair coverage and to be treated the same as her coworkers.